Example 1
- BMR = 1650
- age 30
30
What metabolic age at BMR 1650 and age 30? 30. A heuristic, not a lab test.
Type BMR and age. 1650 and age 30 give 30. 1800 and 35 give 28. 1500 and 40 give 44. The calculator compares your BMR to a 1650 − 5 × (age − 30) sketch, then divides the gap by 25.
Not a clinic verdict and not a lab biological age. The result is a rounded heuristic. You type BMR. The calculator does not compute it.
Enter data and click Calculate.
Metabolic age in this calculator is age plus (reference BMR minus your BMR) / 25. The reference is 1650 − 5 × (age − 30), clipped to 1150-2100. At BMR 1650 and age 30 the gap is 0, so the result is 30 in the result. 1800 and 35 give 28. 1500 and 40 give 44.
Field a is BMR. Field b is age. The calculator does not run Mifflin. You take BMR from the BMR card or from a label. A higher BMR at the same age drops below chronological age. A lower BMR goes up.
The result is an integer, with no word years on the number. The clamp is 15 to 100. BMR 0, age 0, or BMR above 8000 leaves a dash. This is not a lab test and not a cellular age.
BMR computes a base from weight, height, age, and sex. TDEE multiplies that base by PAL. Here you stay with a ready BMR compared to a simple 1650 line. 28 at 1800 and age 35 is not a younger body from a clinic.
Type BMR, type age, then Calculate. A comma in 1650.5 parses. A sketch from a difference, not a doctor note and not a metabolism test.
1650 and age 30 give 30. 1800 and 35 give 28. 1500 and 40 give 44. Number formatting runs only when Format is present. The examples are a bare rounded number. Metabolic age is a heuristic, not a lab test.
met_age = round(age + (refBMR − BMR) / 25); refBMR = 1650 − 5 × (age − 30)
Age plus (refBMR minus BMR) / 25. 1650 and 30 give 30. A heuristic, not a lab test.
30
What metabolic age at BMR 1650 and age 30? 30. A heuristic, not a lab test.
28
What about BMR 1800 and age 35? 28. A higher BMR steps down.
44
What about BMR 1500 and age 40? 44. A lower BMR steps up.
The result is 30. Reference BMR at age 30 is 1650, so the gap is zero and rounding leaves 30.
The result is 28. Reference BMR at age 35 is 1625, so (1625 − 1800) / 25 = −7, and 35 − 7 = 28.
The result is 44. Reference BMR at age 40 is 1600, so (1600 − 1500) / 25 = 4, and 40 + 4 = 44.
No. The first field takes a ready BMR in kilocalories, without weight or height. The Mifflin–St Jeor formula from those values is on the BMR page.
No. A heuristic from the 1650 line. Not a lab age and not a doctor note.
Rounding, then a clamp from 15 to 100. Above 8000 kcal leaves a dash.
A dash. BMR and age must be positive.
Yes. 1650.5 and 30 run through the same formula.
No. BMR and age are not a mass. The result stays the number 30.
A heuristic from the BMR you type. The calculator does not compute Mifflin; this is not a lab age.
Page updated in 2026.